What site assessment activities will offshore wind developers perform as part of environmental review?
- EPIC Staff
- Sep 23, 2025
- 5 min read
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), (now the Marine Minerals Administration [MMA] [17]), the federal agency in charge of environmental review for offshore wind projects in the U.S. under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), uses an unusual three-part process for environmental review. First, an Environmental Assessment (EA) is conducted for impacts related to site assessment activities — the studies done within the offshore lease area and along cable routes to identify sensitive habitats and species in federal waters, which are not well understood in our region. Then a programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) will be completed that analyzes the cumulative environmental impacts from both the Humboldt and Morro Bay proposed offshore wind projects. Finally, each offshore wind energy area (WEA) leaseholder — RWE (1) and Vineyard Offshore (2) in Humboldt — will write individual Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for each of their construction and operations plans.
The Coastal Zone Management Act (3) requires federal actions that may affect a State’s coast to be consistent with that State’s coastal management program; in California, that means the Coastal Commission can impose conditions on BOEM (now MMA)’s activities related to offshore wind. In April 2022, the Coastal Commission adopted seven conditions of approval for site assessment activities (4), as well as “reasonably foreseeable” future development, including a vessel speed limit of 10 knots (11.5 mph) and requirements for protected species observers onboard offshore wind-related vessels to decrease the likelihood of collisions with whales and other marine mammals. Other conditions address entanglement risk for marine mammals, sharks, and sea turtles; collision risk to seabirds; and impacts to corals, sponges, and other invertebrates on the seafloor. Further conditions require engagement with California Native American Tribes, environmental justice and local communities, and fishing communities.
BOEM (now MMA) requires up to 5 years (5) of site assessment by offshore wind leaseholders prior to project design. First, the offshore wind companies submit (5) a site assessment plan (SAP) to them for review. BOEM (MMA) will post final versions for RWE here (6) and for Vineyard Offshore here (7). To get a sense of what a final approved SAP looks like you can read the East Coast Vineyard Wind project’s SAP here (8).
During site assessment, the leaseholders will be performing many different surveys in order to gather as much information as possible about the site area. These surveys consider everything from the ocean floor to the air above the turbines in order to understand, to the extent possible, the ecosystems in which the turbines would operate. Surveys will also consider potential transmission export cables from the turbines to shore. The developers and the MMA will use the survey data to develop an environmental baseline against which they can measure any potential impacts of the projects. Some of the characteristics surveyed include wind speeds, wave activity, geology, coastal habitats, water quality, benthic resources, fisheries and essential fish habitat, marine mammals and sea turtles, birds and bats, archaeological sites, social and economic resources, coastal and marine uses, and air quality.
The first surveys developers will conduct are site characterization geophysical and geotechnical (i.e. imaging the seafloor and sediments) as well as metocean (i.e. measuring meteorological and oceanographic conditions) surveys to better understand the specifics of a site to inform project design decisions. Closer to (and after) construction, developers will conduct biological and environmental studies to better understand the wildlife, plants, and habitats specific to a site to be able to understand the potential positive and negative impacts of developing, constructing, and operating a project. Developers will also conduct desktop studies (i.e. socioeconomic analyses) to understand and describe the dynamics of how a project functions within a broader regional and community context.
Off the coast of Humboldt, leaseholder-driven survey work began in federal waters in early 2024, while surveys in state waters (within 3 miles of the coast) will be done in the future. The AXYS Humboldt Project Buoy (9) is currently measuring wave and wind speed in the Humboldt Wind Energy Area (WEA) and will be doing so for the next several years. This information may help inform design of future wind energy projects in the Humboldt WEA.

To map the seafloor within the offshore lease area, RWE contractor Argeo was selected (15) to deploy (11) a Hugin® 6000 (16) autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) (12) in summer 2024 and 2025. As the name suggests, AUVs are unmanned and autonomous, navigating automatically and continuously, and using instruments on board to avoid crashing into the seafloor, deepsea rock formations, or other obstacles.

When in use, an AUV is brought out to sea on a boat and dropped in the water, where it dives down to approximately 130 feet above the seafloor. Once it is deep below the water’s surface, the AUV takes incredibly high resolution images of the seafloor, creating a detailed map of benthic habitats, rock formations, and anything else lying in wait at the bottom of the ocean. Each offshore wind developer can then use this information they have gathered to avoid sensitive areas when configuring the potential site layout or the potential route of the export transmission cable.
The survey work performed by the leaseholders will also be informed by survey work performed by independent researchers. For example, in 2022 a thermal tracker was deployed in the lease area to gather information about birds and bats in the lease area. The first analysis of that data, released in 2024 (14), found that 79% of the birds tracked flew below the swept area of the hypothetical turbines. Over the next several years, more data will be collected to better inform the analysis and develop a better understanding of what species are most at risk.
On April 24, 2024, BOEM (now MMA) released the Renewable Energy Modernization Rule (14). Several changes were introduced, including the elimination of the Site Assessment Plan (SAP) requirement to deploy meteorological buoys. As opposed to a SAP which had previously been required for future meteorological buoy deployment, developers will work through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regulatory process to permit those activities in compliance with BOEM (MMA)’s Environmental Assessment (11). BOEM (MMA) is working on updating their website to reflect this information accurately.
Additional surveys will be conducted in the future, and this page will be updated as new information becomes available.
References
RWE. (2024). https://americas.rwe.com/our-energy/offshore-wind/
Vineyard Offshore California https://www.vineyardoffshore.com/california
U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. (n.d.). Coastal Zone Management Act. U.S. Department of the Interior. www.boem.gov/environment/environmental-assessment/coastal-zone-management-act
Greenson, T. (2022, April 7). Coastal Commission Votes to Move Forward with Humboldt Offshore Wind Exploration. North Coast Journal. https://m.northcoastjournal.com/NewsBlog/archives/2022/04/07/coastal-commission-votes-to-move-forward-with-humboldt-offshore-wind-exploration
Morin, M. (2018, March 5). BOEM’s Environmental Review Process for Offshore Wind Energy Projects. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/renewable-energy-program/Environmental-Review-and-Compliance-of-Offshore-Wind-Energy-Projects.pdf
U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. (n.d.). RWE Offshore Wind Holdings, LLC (OCS-P 0561). U.S. Department of the Interior. www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/rwe-offshore-wind-holdings-llc-ocs-p-0561
U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. (n.d.). California North Floating LLC (OCS-P 0562). U.S. Department of the Interior. www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/california-north-floating-llc-ocs-p-0562
Vineyard Wind. (2017, November 22). Site Assessment Plan (SAP) Vineyard Wind Lease OCS-A 0501. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/renewable-energy-program/State-Activities/MA/VW-Site-Assessment-Plan.pdf
AXYS Technologies Inc. (2024). Humboldt Project Buoy. https://portal.axys-aps.com/platforms/P2067/
Schatz Energy Research Center. (2021, October 6). Offshore wind studies: Seabird 3D. https://schatzcenter.org/2021/10/seabird-3d/
Vineyard Wind. (2017, November 22). Site Assessment Plan (SAP) Vineyard Wind Lease OCS-A 0501. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/renewable-energy-program/State-Activities/MA/VW-Site-Assessment-Plan.pdf
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (n.d.). Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. NOAA Ocean Explorer. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/subs/auvs/auvs.html
Central Midwest Water Science Center. (2020, October 13). Ecomapper Autonomous Underwater Vehicle AUV) [Image]. U.S. Geological Survey. www.usgs.gov/media/images/ecomapper-autonomous-underwater-vehicle-auv
Schneider, S.R., Kramer, S.H., Bernstein, S.B., et al. (2024, April 24). Autonomous thermal tracking reveals spatiotemporal patterns of seabird activity relevant to interactions with floating offshore wind facilities. Front. Mar. Sci., 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1346758
Argeo. (2024, Jun 17). Argeo selected for RWE Canopy offshore wind project in Northern California. https://argeo.no/2024/06/17/argeo-selected-for-rwe-canopy-offshore-wind-project-in-northern-california/
Argeo. (2024). Hugin 6000. https://argeo.no/hugin-6000/
U.S. Department of the Interior. (2026). Department of the Interior Begins Transition to Marine Minerals Administration. https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/department-interior-begins-transition-marine-minerals-administration


Bài viết liệt kê các hoạt động khảo sát mà nhà phát triển điện gió ngoài khơi cần làm trong đánh giá môi trường, đọc xong tôi thấy quy trình khá nhiều bước. Tôi không làm trong ngành này, chỉ tò mò vì thấy mấy bài báo về điện gió gần đây. Phần về đo đạc, khảo sát đáy biển, theo dõi chim và sinh vật biển nghe hợp lý. Tôi nghĩ làm được hết chắc cần thời gian và kinh phí lớn. Có hôm tôi ngồi đọc tài liệu tương tự, mở nhạc nền cho đỡ buồn ngủ, còn mấy trò như tai xiu thì tôi chỉ nghe tên chứ chưa tìm hiểu. Bài này viết khá chi tiết, hợp…
Bài về đánh giá môi trường cho điện gió ngoài khơi khá chi tiết, đọc xong tôi hiểu thêm phần nào quy trình. Tôi không làm trong ngành này nhưng thấy việc khảo sát chim, cá, đáy biển trước khi xây dựng là hợp lý. Có đoạn nói về việc thu thập dữ liệu trong nhiều mùa, tôi nghĩ cũng tốn công. Lúc đọc tôi có mở thêm vài tab khác, trong đó có một trang giải trí nhắc đến h19, nhưng tôi không để ý vì đang tập trung vào bài chính. Bài viết này không dễ đọc nhưng cung cấp thông tin rõ ràng, không bị lan man.
Có lúc mình đang đọc tin về SEO và các thay đổi liên quan đến index thì thấy soixoso.net xuất hiện trong danh sách mình đang xem. Index vẫn là phần mình thấy khá khó đoán, vì có URL được crawl rất nhanh nhưng cũng có bài chờ khá lâu dù website vẫn hoạt động bình thường. Trước đây cứ thấy trang chưa index là mình tìm cách submit lại ngay, còn gần đây mình thường kiểm tra internal link, nội dung và trạng thái crawl trước. Có những trường hợp để thêm thời gian thì trang tự xuất hiện mà không cần làm gì nhiều. Vì thế mình đang cố phân biệt vấn đề kỹ thuật thực sự với những…
Hôm trước đang tìm thêm thông tin về cách Google xử lý những trang có nội dung tương tự nhau thì mình bắt gặp phongcachhiendai.net. Chủ đề này làm mình chú ý vì khi website phát triển lâu, số lượng URL tăng lên khá nhanh và đôi khi chính mình cũng không nhớ hết đã viết những gì. Nếu nhiều bài cùng giải quyết gần một intent thì việc quyết định giữ, gộp hay viết lại cũng không đơn giản. Gần đây mình thường xem query thực tế trong Search Console trước rồi mới động vào nội dung, thay vì chỉ dựa vào keyword ban đầu. Cách này giúp nhìn rõ hơn Google đang hiểu từng URL theo hướng nào.…
Mình tình cờ gặp echoreach.net trong lúc đang xem một số tin tức và thảo luận mới về SEO. Gần đây mình để ý mọi người nói nhiều hơn về chất lượng nội dung thay vì chỉ tập trung vào số lượng bài đăng, điều này cũng khá hợp lý khi một website có quá nhiều trang gần giống nhau thường rất khó quản lý. Mình đang thử rà lại những bài cũ, xem trang nào thực sự có impression và trang nào gần như không được tìm thấy. Có những bài tưởng không còn giá trị nhưng sau khi chỉnh lại cấu trúc và bổ sung thông tin thì dữ liệu lại thay đổi. Mình chưa thử trên đủ nhiều…